ABSTRACT
Pragmatic encroachers argue that whether you know that p depends on a combination of pragmatic and epistemic factors. Most defences of pragmatic encroachment focus on a particular pragmatic factor: how much is at stake for an individual. This raises a question: are there reasons for thinking that knowledge depends on other pragmatic factors that parallel the reasons for thinking that knowledge depends on the stakes? In this chapter I argue that there are parallel reasons for thinking that knowledge depends on social factors such as one’s social role or identity. I call this “social encroachment.” After defending social encroachment, I compare and contrast social encroachment with some key ideas in feminist epistemology. I argue that, while there are some important similarities, there are also some important differences. I finish by commenting on what I take the upshots of these differences to be.
