ABSTRACT
At times, archaeologists find themselves straddling a difficult divide. While conscious of the shared and non-renewable nature of cultural resources, they are also aware that archaeological activities can encourage the destruction of that which they endeavour to preserve. The spectacular character of certain types of discoveries can arouse excitement and interest in archaeological activities, but it can also fuel resentments and jealousies on the part of those who perceive that professionals benefit personally from their discoveries. Archaeologists are well aware that the global patrimony provides a unique foundation for comprehending humanity’s myriad different faces, as well as its similarities, but they are not always aware of how others view their activities, or the past itself. Although they may recognize the need to encourage a more involved and educated public, the question can also be asked: which public? For example, local inhabitants see cultural resources differently than governmental agencies and academic departments; tourists, collectors and wellendowed foundations have different expectations than local inhabitants; and citizens in one country may or may not see the benefits of protecting resources in their original context but far from home and so forth.
