ABSTRACT

Both women believed that, in patronizing chapels of their own building that were fully under their control, they were exerting no different kind of authority from the patronage which female aristocrats had always exercised with propriety and as of right. Lady Glenorchy in 1775 informed the Edinburgh Presbytery that she intended her chapel to serve several hundred poor people of that city whom she felt were not adequately catered for by the present church system. The next year, she wrote to them after they made some objections to her choice of chaplain:

I have already acquainted the Presbytery that the chapel is private property, and was never intended to be put upon the footing of the Establishment, nor connected with it as a chapel of ease to the city of Edinburgh . . . Having built the chapel wholly at my own expense for the accommodation of my family and numbers of poor people who at present are deprived of the best, and to many of them, the only means of being instructed in the principles of our holy religion, I think myself entitled to name the minister thereof, especially as no person is under any obligation to join with him in his ministrations, but such as shall voluntarily choose to do so.9