ABSTRACT
Every science has its subjective side. Our motivations do not stem from mere rational considerations; a study of the subjective roots of scientific zeal would in fact be very promising. Yet, although scientists do not object to the analysis of the more private sides of geniuses like Einstein or Freud, they not only tend to resist strongly any attempt at looking behind their own professed objectivity, but also to look askance at those who more candidly confess to their more subjective motivations and reactions. Objectivity, too, exacts a price, although different: it consists in creating a make-belief-reality of abstract concepts and, all too often, unrealistic data. Thus, the task we face is to find the balance between an honest assessment of one’s own role, a gathering of culturally valid data, and the critical evaluation of both.
