ABSTRACT

China’s reform of its large state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has followed an

evolutionary path. After the early 1980s, China’s SOEs adopted the ‘director

responsibility system’ and the ‘contract management responsibility system’.

They also experimented with lease, merger, bankruptcy, joint stock holdings,

joint ventures with foreign partners, as well as domestic and international

listings. In the 1990s, the strategy for further reforming the state-owned sector

was to ‘grasp the big and let go the small’ (zhua da fang xiao), which was

initiated in the ninth five-year plan (1996-2000) and remained the strategy for

continuous reform in the state-owned enterprises in the tenth five-year plan

(2001-5). With these institutional innovations, China has been experimentally

changing the SOEs through a combination of central policy, local initiative, and

interaction with international investment (Nolan and Wang, 1999). Throughout

the course of reform, a consistent stated goal of China’s industrial policy has

been to construct globally powerful companies that can compete on the global

level playing field (Nolan and Zhang, 2002). From the late 1990s, for those

SOEs which evolved from former government ministries, the strategy has been

to restructure and float in the international market (chongzu shangshi). The

restructuring aims to establish the modern enterprise system (xiandai qiye

zhidu). The productive assets of the large enterprises were reorganised into a

joint stock company with a multidivisional structure and a system of boards

and supervisory boards. The process involves large-scale asset reorganisation

and massive workforce ‘splitting off’ (fen liu). As the large Chinese firms

began operating under the new organisational structure, they faced critical

issues in building up both business and organisational capabilities. The role of

corporate headquarters is central in the process of establishing the modern

enterprise system. This chapter examines some of the theoretical and empirical

issues with regard to the function of corporate headquarters within large

corporations.