ABSTRACT
AC In your Kuttna lecture, ‘The Evil Demon of Images’, you invoke the notion of the immorality of images, at one point declaring that ‘the image has taken over and imposed its own immanent, ephemeral logic; an immoral logic without depth, beyond good and evil, beyond truth and falsity My question is this: if this logic lies beyond good and evil, why is it not an amoral rather than an immoral logic?
