ABSTRACT
WE have already commented on the fact that C.F.S.s for the Guilford questionnaire are intermediate between the Eysenck and the Cattell ones. Table 18.1 below shows the actual figures in some detail; optimum matching was attempted along the lines described in the preceding section. As before, we shall discuss all those pairs of factors whose C.F.S.s are above 0·60. Comparisons will also be made with the predicted factor patterns given by Guilford on the basis of previous work. Guilford C.F.S. Data
|
Male Factor |
Female Factor |
C.F.S. |
|---|---|---|
|
1 |
17 |
0·74 |
|
2 |
4 |
−0·94 |
|
3 |
3 |
0·63 |
|
4 |
19 |
0·51 |
|
5 |
9 |
−0·72 |
|
6 |
6 |
−0·61 |
|
7 |
10 |
−0·65 |
|
8 |
8 |
0·49 |
|
9 |
1 |
−0·90 |
|
10 |
13 |
0·84 |
|
11 |
12 |
0·42 |
|
12 |
5 |
0·85 |
|
13 |
11 |
0·75 |
|
14 |
18 |
0·54 |
|
15 |
15 |
0·51 |
|
16 |
7 |
0·76 |
|
17 |
14 |
0·31 |
|
18 |
17 |
−0·49 |
|
19 |
16 |
0·12 |
|
20 |
2 |
0·77 |
