ABSTRACT

The most controversial issue of Zhu Xi’s exegesis of the Book of Songs is his discussion of the “licentious poems” (yinshi). While rejecting the orthodox Han-Tang exegeses, Zhu Xi labeled dozens of poems in the “Airs of the States” (guofeng) as “poems of elopement and trysting.” 1 This conclusion contradicted the established Confucian tenet that the Book of Songs contained “no evil in its thinking” 2 and aroused heated debates in later centuries. Recently this issue has drawn much scholarly attention. Steven Van Zoeren, for example, has asserted that the Song Neo-Confucian hermeneutics of the Songs signifies a turning point in the tradition of classical studies in premodern China. According to Van Zoeren, Zhu Xi’s discovery of the “licentious poems” meant a “revolution” in the interpretation of the Songs and became foundational for much of modern scholarship on the Songs. 3 More recently, Achim Mittag has called Zhu Xi’s hermeneutics of the Songs a “Copernican Revolution” and has argued that his hermeneutics of the “Airs of the States” implies that the reader’s role is more important than that of the author. 4