ABSTRACT
This chapter analyzes data from one hundred family group conferences (FGCs) in Washington State to examine the links between conference decisions, the content of conferencing plans, and two widely adopted practice frameworks: family-centered practice and the strengths perspective. It explores a primary reason for the reinforcement that FGC provides for the use of kinship placements, is the extent to which it is consistent with family-centered and strengths-based practice. The family members attending conferences brought with them a number of personal and interpersonal concerns, including difficulties with substance abuse, challenges in meeting basic needs, and concerns over physical safety. The evaluation data indicate that conference participants created thoughtful and detailed plans for keeping their children safe following a conference. The quantitative data from this evaluation add to the growing body of knowledge on the impact of family group conferencing on children and families receiving child welfare services.
