ABSTRACT
This chapter examines Earth Jurisprudence arguably renders itself politically unpalatable, and so conclude by delving deeper into the question of strategy in order to explore the prospects or even the possibility of a Wild Law from below. It describes a word about whether it is appropriate to speak of Wild Law if the changes aimed for are brought about from below rather than from the top down. After all, conventional use of the word law implies a rule or body of rules emanating from parliament or the courts, and indeed Earth jurists accept that Earth Jurisprudence, human law is the essence of what is meant by the term law. Its meaning is largely consistent with orthodox theory. Parliament and the courts follows that Wild Law from below is not a coherent category on the grounds that it is not law, proper.
