ABSTRACT
The idea of promoting democracy in non-democratic societies raises four important questions. First, since democracy takes different forms in different historical epochs and societies, what is it that we wish to promote in its name? Second, since we can legitimately promote and impose on others what is good for them or in their interest, is democracy a universally desirable good? Third, if it is, do we have a duty to promote it, and what is its basis? Since there is much to be said for leaving each society free to organize its collective affairs, what is the best trade-off between the goods of democracy and self-determination? Fourth and finally, if we conclude that on balance we have a duty to promote democracy, what is the best way to do so? I shall take each in turn.
