Q 81-5 a) According to the modern tendency, where is restitution to be made under Art. 81 CISG? b) Is the passing of risk when making restitution settled in Art. 81 CISG? c) How is the question of where restitution is to be made connected to the question of when the risk passes from one party to the other? See in this regard sub Articles 67–69 CISG. Q 81-6 How is the assumption on which the restitution mechanism of the CISG is based, namely that the goods can be returned in the same condition in which they were delivered, curtailed by Art. 82 CISG? Cf. also C 81-2. Q 81-7 a) When will there be an overlap between Art. 81 CISG and domestic insolvency law? b) How did the court in C4-2 explain that domestic insolvency law should take priority over Art. 81 CISG? c) What are the difficulties associated with such an approach?

DOI link for Q 81-5 a) According to the modern tendency, where is restitution to be made under Art. 81 CISG? b) Is the passing of risk when making restitution settled in Art. 81 CISG? c) How is the question of where restitution is to be made connected to the question of when the risk passes from one party to the other? See in this regard sub Articles 67–69 CISG. Q 81-6 How is the assumption on which the restitution mechanism of the CISG is based, namely that the goods can be returned in the same condition in which they were delivered, curtailed by Art. 82 CISG? Cf. also C 81-2. Q 81-7 a) When will there be an overlap between Art. 81 CISG and domestic insolvency law? b) How did the court in C4-2 explain that domestic insolvency law should take priority over Art. 81 CISG? c) What are the difficulties associated with such an approach?

Q 81-5 a) According to the modern tendency, where is restitution to be made under Art. 81 CISG? b) Is the passing of risk when making restitution settled in Art. 81 CISG? c) How is the question of where restitution is to be made connected to the question of when the risk passes from one party to the other? See in this regard sub Articles 67–69 CISG. Q 81-6 How is the assumption on which the restitution mechanism of the CISG is based, namely that the goods can be returned in the same condition in which they were delivered, curtailed by Art. 82 CISG? Cf. also C 81-2. Q 81-7 a) When will there be an overlap between Art. 81 CISG and domestic insolvency law? b) How did the court in C4-2 explain that domestic insolvency law should take priority over Art. 81 CISG? c) What are the difficulties associated with such an approach?