ABSTRACT

This book examines selected high-profile U.S. First Amendment cases occurring during the Trump era as a vehicle for exploring a possible fundamental commonality in understanding the democratic rule of law globally. In each of these cases, the adjudicating body’s analytical legal strategy is discussed in terms of how it reinforces or detracts from the democratic rule of law. It was and continues to be highly internationally anticipated as to what legal examples are being set by this established democracy when confronted by legal contests between the former Trump administration and those alleging their rights were somehow violated by the executive of that time. Thus, the book is instructive for an international audience on the essential role of the courts in protecting democracy through providing, where supported by the law and the facts, a remedy for the aggrieved comparatively powerless. The book will be essential reading for academics and researchers working in the areas of constitutional law, politics and human rights.

chapter 2|28 pages

The Trump First Amendment Twitter Case

Blocking the Public's Political Speech on Government Social Media Accounts

chapter 5|35 pages

The First Amendment Rights of Public School Students

The Snapchat Case

chapter 6|19 pages

The Democratic Rule of Law, Religious Freedom and the Public Interest

Different Cases, Different Equities to Consider

chapter 7|7 pages

Concluding Remarks

On the Role of the Courts in Upholding the Democratic Rule of Law