ABSTRACT

This book brings together leading scholars of the history of economic thought to demonstrate the vitality and richness of a discipline that welcomes both practitioners of intellectual, contextual history, as well as specialists in the historical explanation of the analytical and theoretical dimension of economic science. They shed new light on a variety of themes and problems and move the frontier of knowledge in the areas covered.

Economic Analyses in Historical Perspective is presented in three parts. The first deals with French traditions in economics, a field that Gilbert Faccarello has tilled for many years and to which he has made numerous contributions. The second turns to the dissemination and diffusion of economic ideas and theories across national borders, and thus to the European and even global level. Finally, the third part deals with analytical developments in some selected fields of economics: public economics, monetary policy, trade theory and spatial economics.

This volume is of great importance to those who study history of economic thought, political economy and monetary economics. The chapters’ centre around the work of Gilbert Faccarello, making this book a fitting tribute to his academic career on the history of economic theory and ideas.

part 1|16 pages

Introduction

chapter 2|6 pages

Gilbert, the man with his head above the clouds

Personal reminiscences

part 2|64 pages

French traditions in economics

chapter 5|9 pages

Opinion, time and institution

Necker’s critique of ‘new science’ 1

chapter 8|9 pages

Pellegrino Rossi

A Ricardian at the Collège de France?

part 4|93 pages

Theoretical developments

chapter 17|21 pages

Individual choice and the public economy

Musgrave vs. Pigou

chapter 18|11 pages

Competition in Public Finance

From De Viti de Marco’s lectures to his Principles

chapter 20|9 pages

The first steps of the money doctor

Kemmerer’s gold exchange standard in the Philippines

chapter 22|9 pages

Consumption and money-making in Keynes

Enjoyments of life or morbid instincts?