ABSTRACT

Trial by jury is not a fundamental part of the Japanese legal system, but there has been a recent important move towards this with the introduction in 2009 of the lay assessor system whereby lay people sit with judges in criminal trials. This book considers the debates in Japan which surround this development. It examines the political and socio-legal contexts, contrasting the view that the participation of ordinary citizens in criminal trials is an important manifestation of democracy, with the view that Japan as a society where authority is highly venerated is not natural territory for a system where lay people are likely to express views at odds with expert judges. It discusses Japan’s earlier experiments with jury trials in the late 19th Century, the period 1923-43, and up to 1970 in US-controlled Okinawa, compares developing views in Japan on this issue with views in other countries, where dissatisfaction with the jury system is often evident, and concludes by assessing how the new system in Japan is working out and how it is likely to develop.

chapter |5 pages

Introduction

part |28 pages

Trial by jury and judicial reforms in Japan

chapter |26 pages

Policy-making and judicial reforms in contemporary Japan

The context of the trial by jury 1

part |53 pages

Trial by jury in a historical context

chapter |23 pages

Early experiences with the trial by jury

Japan's struggle with modernization

part |102 pages

Trial by jury in contemporary Japan

chapter |32 pages

The dynamics of the mixed jury system (saiban'in) in contemporary Japan

Drafting, content and practice

chapter |32 pages

The saiban'in juror in the criminal court

On becoming a good citizen?

chapter |5 pages

Conclusion