ABSTRACT

In this essay I suggest that a direct approach to Pauline literature for the purposes of understanding the notion and actions of resilience is inadvisable due to the ambiguity of the term and the lack of specific references to the topic in Paul’s letters. Rather, I suggest that an indirect approach be used that explores Paul’s instructions to his congregations as they face internal and external challenges to their existence. I use 1 Thessalonians as a test case and offer the following as guidelines for considering resilience from a Pauline perspective:

Rather than attempt to define resilient existence, Paul points to exemplars of such a life, showing that resilience is a habit rather than an individuated capacity.

The exemplars are located within communities of support and belief. One does not found resilience on one’s own, but relies on the sustenance of God and fellow community members.

Any actions of resilience are located in a narrative of memory and hope, which defines the life before God.

This allows for multiple examples to be used, without forcing them into an arbitrary set of characteristics or pre-set definition of resilience.

Resilience is best taught through imitative practices, both of the character of God and those who understand themselves as seeking a sanctified life before God.