ABSTRACT
G; near-IR n. As such,
e 3.3 shows
inance valgreen colors g, however, f plants and
e courtesy of
51
52
Figu (Ima
trees con they app ply a hea night-vis The “shot no portant t cant noi have not ements t under lo also the Ther of field; resulting scene; n mented b mulating The can also clear nig may satu Ligh in a sce bright ha
re 3.4. Identic ges courtesy o
taining chlor ear much bri lthy boost to ion scene to same techniq ise” discusse o increase th se compared iceable fixed hat may be ad w-light and h loss of contra e are anomal NVGs are fo scene is blur ote that the d y jittering th the results [S prominence be seen in Fi ht to the nak rate entire pi t blooms are ne saturate t los surround
al scene rend f SDS Interna
ophyll are hi ghter than yo ambient lig
accomplish th ues for simu d for IR sens e noise as a to a scene i -pattern nois ded to the fin igh-light con st under lowies specific to cused just lik ry. Figure 3. istant buildin e view frustu hreiner 2006
of stars on a gure 3.4. Wh ed eye, many xel elements an important
he sensor; fo ing the light
ered under hig tional.)
ghly reflectiv u would exp
ht when rend is.
