ABSTRACT
The development of wrist arthroscopy in the mid 1980s was a
major advance in the diagnosis and management of wrist
disorders, and its application indications continue to expand
with technologic improvements. Prior to the advent of wrist
arthroscopy, the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the
wrist was limited to radiographic studies or arthrotomy.
Arthroscopy allows for the direct visualization of articular
surfaces of the carpal bones as well as the evaluation of their
relative positions. The operative modality also allows for the
direct inspection of both extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments of the
wrist and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). This
results in the identification of articular pathology that might
remain unrecognized with standard imaging studies. Since the
use of arthroscopic assessment of the wrist joint has gained a
prominent role as a diagnostic tool, it has become clear that
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and wrist arthrography are
less sensitive and specific than arthroscopy in detecting patho-
logic changes in the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints (1-3). As
a result of this increased sensitivity, the procedure allows for
the adjudication of diagnoses that had previously been gener-
ically classified as “wrist sprain” (4). For example, prior to the
advent of wrist arthroscopy, patients with either attenuation or
partial tears or attenuation of the scapholunate interosseus
ligament (SLIL) or lunotriquetral interosseus ligament (LTIL)
not visualized on MRI or arthrography were given the
diagnosis of “wrist sprain.” Wrist arthroscopy allows for the
identification of these pathologic changes and treatment in
the form of debridement and/or electrothermal collagen
shrinkage (ECS) (5).