ABSTRACT
The web-based teaching is an important way to solve the problem of education development in the information era, and the quality of the web-based course has directly aected the instructional eectiveness. The focus of the evaluation of The web-based Course is the development of The evaluation standard, such as The United States instruction design and apply professional committee’s E-learning certification standard, America Training & Development Association’s (ASTD) courseware certification standard, American higher education policy institute and Blackboard company jointly issued, Quality On The Line, Monterrey international study institute’s OCEP engineering, etc. Analysis of the existing standards, we found: The index system for evaluation more as are the expertise, this kind of evaluation standard is used more for the relative departments to check the web-based course, evaluation data sources not form students. This paper suggests that, the web-based course Certification should pay attention to the actual teaching eect, which the check should be after the applying of webbased course work, but not the reverse, we should give full consideration to the student evaluation and the relevant data about students’ E-learning. Second, many web-based course Certification models, are still
given priority to the linear model, experts evaluate each specific index to the quantitative estimation, and weighted average calculation for the last comprehensive evaluation result, its core thought based on the assumption that the evaluation results can be stacked, evaluation factors are linearity. In reality, however, in the evaluation standard of web-based course, many indexes often with a degree of ambiguity, which is of nonlinear characteristics, it has no very clear boundaries that are not absolute armation and negative [1].
