ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: While there are several sustainability rating systems available for pavements, their immediate use in the design phase of a project is somewhat difficult. These rating systems are fairly complex and some of them require the services of a third party, for a fee, or the expertise of certified individuals to evaluate and certify projects. Designers looking for sustainable pavement rehabilitation solutions on smaller projects and with limited budgets may not have the time and resources to use these existing rating systems. This paper describes the development of a simple, fast and convenient system that can be used to compare different design and rehabilitation alternatives based on their sustainability features. Four components are included in the analysis: materials, construction methods, surface properties and cost effectiveness. Colors are used to emphasize the sustainable aspects of a given alternative.
