Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter
Chapter
rangeofcon te mpo ra ry G reek speculation . Itiseasytoforget how lo ngitw as beforetherew as an ylarge body ofo rth odoxChristiantheologicaldoctrine . Itisama tt erofsixorsevenrather th a n one o r tw ogener ationsafterChrist 's dea th before we find , inC le mentofA le xandr ia and hispupilO rig e n , thefirstcomp re hens iv eattemptstoexplicatesystematically , in G reek philosophicalterms , theperfectionofG od, H is relationtothecreation , theun io nof body an dsoul in hum an b e in g s an d so o n ; and much ofwh at these tw o men ta ughtw as far fro mtheeventualor th odoxyoftheChu rc h . Indeed , thefirstcreed in te ndedprimarilytosettletheologicalissues , rather th andiffer encesinethicalop in io norchurchritual , w as thatissued by theCounc il ofN ic aeaof 325 A .D . Aga in , itw as o n ly graduallythat th eChu rc hdef in edthecanonofHo ly Scripture . Foral th oughthegospelsw ere a lw ays , ofcourse , ta kenasrecordsofGod 's w o rd , theaccep ta nceof th e O ld Tes ta mentasadivinelyinspiredtextw as notcomp le te untilthe se condcentury . 143 W ith thecanondefined , itw as notdifficultforaChristiantoseethem ain pointsma rk in goffhis th e o lo g y fro mthatofthevariousG re ekphilosophicalschools . For 142 ChristianityE dw Y o rk , 1957 ), C ( f in Hathiarpstterpchu , The In11b . lished , flLuoenndcoeno18f8G8 ; rereekpIrdinetaesd , o n New 143Ibid . . 316 -1 9 .
DOI link for rangeofcon te mpo ra ry G reek speculation . Itiseasytoforget how lo ngitw as beforetherew as an ylarge body ofo rth odoxChristiantheologicaldoctrine . Itisama tt erofsixorsevenrather th a n one o r tw ogener ationsafterChrist 's dea th before we find , inC le mentofA le xandr ia and hispupilO rig e n , thefirstcomp re hens iv eattemptstoexplicatesystematically , in G reek philosophicalterms , theperfectionofG od, H is relationtothecreation , theun io nof body an dsoul in hum an b e in g s an d so o n ; and much ofwh at these tw o men ta ughtw as far fro mtheeventualor th odoxyoftheChu rc h . Indeed , thefirstcreed in te ndedprimarilytosettletheologicalissues , rather th andiffer encesinethicalop in io norchurchritual , w as thatissued by theCounc il ofN ic aeaof 325 A .D . Aga in , itw as o n ly graduallythat th eChu rc hdef in edthecanonofHo ly Scripture . Foral th oughthegospelsw ere a lw ays , ofcourse , ta kenasrecordsofGod 's w o rd , theaccep ta nceof th e O ld Tes ta mentasadivinelyinspiredtextw as notcomp le te untilthe se condcentury . 143 W ith thecanondefined , itw as notdifficultforaChristiantoseethem ain pointsma rk in goffhis th e o lo g y fro mthatofthevariousG re ekphilosophicalschools . For 142 ChristianityE dw Y o rk , 1957 ), C ( f in Hathiarpstterpchu , The In11b . lished , flLuoenndcoeno18f8G8 ; rereekpIrdinetaesd , o n New 143Ibid . . 316 -1 9 .
rangeofcon te mpo ra ry G reek speculation . Itiseasytoforget how lo ngitw as beforetherew as an ylarge body ofo rth odoxChristiantheologicaldoctrine . Itisama tt erofsixorsevenrather th a n one o r tw ogener ationsafterChrist 's dea th before we find , inC le mentofA le xandr ia and hispupilO rig e n , thefirstcomp re hens iv eattemptstoexplicatesystematically , in G reek philosophicalterms , theperfectionofG od, H is relationtothecreation , theun io nof body an dsoul in hum an b e in g s an d so o n ; and much ofwh at these tw o men ta ughtw as far fro mtheeventualor th odoxyoftheChu rc h . Indeed , thefirstcreed in te ndedprimarilytosettletheologicalissues , rather th andiffer encesinethicalop in io norchurchritual , w as thatissued by theCounc il ofN ic aeaof 325 A .D . Aga in , itw as o n ly graduallythat th eChu rc hdef in edthecanonofHo ly Scripture . Foral th oughthegospelsw ere a lw ays , ofcourse , ta kenasrecordsofGod 's w o rd , theaccep ta nceof th e O ld Tes ta mentasadivinelyinspiredtextw as notcomp le te untilthe se condcentury . 143 W ith thecanondefined , itw as notdifficultforaChristiantoseethem ain pointsma rk in goffhis th e o lo g y fro mthatofthevariousG re ekphilosophicalschools . For 142 ChristianityE dw Y o rk , 1957 ), C ( f in Hathiarpstterpchu , The In11b . lished , flLuoenndcoeno18f8G8 ; rereekpIrdinetaesd , o n New 143Ibid . . 316 -1 9 .
ABSTRACT
God, who made heaven and earth, has worked miracles and
granted each human soul personal immortality in the sight 144of His eternal life. Why, then, is the situation so
complicated for the historian of natural history and natural
philosophy? It is not that the theology of the two testa
ments is vastly more complex than this summary statement of
Scriptural doctrine implies, so that the canon itself
inevitably became the source of numerous Christian theolo
gies. It is rather that, on every term and proposition in
this statement, the various Greek traditions in ontology and
cosmology suggested almost endless comments. The topic of
organic diversity bears on every one.