ABSTRACT
Michael Huemer think the realist about ethical intuition is no worse off than the realist about sense perception when it comes to addressing the challenge of skepticism and so if we reject scepticism about the external, empirical world we should also reject scepticism about ethics. But we do not face in either domain a stark choice between realism and skepticism. There is a range of intermediate options and these options seem much more credible in the ethical case than the perceptual.
