ABSTRACT
The interactional tradition that for the first time took care of the concept of interaction and that, after so long, opened the door to non-traditional logic, stopped and got lost in the paradox, as if it was the only existing logical criterion to oppose traditional criteria. The pathology builds itself through the interaction between the person with herself, with others, and with the world; these interactions create a reality that is not an absolute truth but, for the person who considers it true, is truer than the truth. The subjects’ reaction to the experiment was most curious: most of them refused to believe the psychologist and showed great difficulty in giving up the vision they had built in their minds. At the beginning, the experimenter rated almost all the subject’s responses as false, then, in a completely arbitrary manner, the experimenter began to declare that some answers were correct.
