ABSTRACT
Implicating “Nothing” to entrepreneurial theory means that technology is essential to Nothing. The term entrepreneurship has been explored by means of the three paired categories: becoming and being, decision-making and dwelling, activity and passivity. The range between two different analytical probes may be understood based on the lack of a coherent paradigm example in entrepreneurial research. Pursuing such a binding interpretation could have implications for how to understand the applicable or decision-making paradigm in entrepreneurial theory. There is always the danger that the entrepreneurs are playing the game and ignore the fact that the entrepreneurial being is also played with. It is worthwhile to question whether entrepreneurial research, provided it is equipped with more objectivity, reason, theory, knowledge creation and empirical documentation, actually improves entrepreneurial practice. In D. Hjorth and C. Johannisson’s case, dialogical learning and “entrepreneurial” dialogues are both a normative and analytical entity.
