ABSTRACT

In, Love and Politics Jeffery L. Nicholas argues that Eros is the final rejection of an alienated life, in which humans are prevented from developing their human powers; Eros, in contrast, is an overflowing of acting into new realities and new beauties, a world in which human beings extend their powers and senses.

Nicholas uniquely interprets Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism as a response to alienation defined as the divorce of fact from value. However, this account cannot address alienation in the form of the oppression of women or people of color. Importantly, it fails to acknowledge the domination of nature that blackens the heart of alienated life. Alienation must be seen as a separation of the human from nature. Nicholas turns to Aristotle, first, to uncover the way his philosophy embodies a divorce of human from nature, then to reconstruct the essential elements of Aristotle’s metaphysics to defend a philosophical anthropology based on Eros.

Love and Politics: Persistent Human Desires as a Foundation for Liberation presents a critical theory that synthesizes MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism, Frankfurt School Critical Theory, and Social Reproduction Theory. It will be of great interest to political theorists and philosophers.

chapter |17 pages

Introduction

section I|68 pages

Alienation and Revolutionary Aristotelianism

chapter 1|21 pages

Marx’s Theory of Alienation

chapter 2|24 pages

Macintyre’s Interpretation of Alienation

chapter 3|22 pages

Revolutionary Aristotelianism

section II|64 pages

Lacunae

chapter 4|18 pages

Human Nature, Reason, and Love

chapter 5|25 pages

Fishing, Social Reproduction, and Nature

section III|67 pages

Eros and Human Nature

chapter 7|27 pages

Toward a Metaphysical Biology

chapter 8|21 pages

Erotic Nature

chapter 9|18 pages

Eros and the Varieties of Love

section IV|35 pages

Epilogue

chapter 10|27 pages

Erotic Practices; Erotic Communities

chapter |7 pages

Conclusion