ABSTRACT

This book provides the first comprehensive examination of Karl Barth’s view of beauty. For over fifty years, scholars have assumed Barth recovered traditional belief in God’s beauty but refused to entertain any relationship between this and more familiar natural and artistic beauties. Hans Urs von Balthasar was the first to offer this interpretation, and his conclusion has been echoed ever since, rendering Barth’s view of beauty irrelevant to work in theological aesthetics. This volume continues the late-twentieth-century revision of Balthasar’s interpretation of Barth by arguing that this too is a significant misunderstanding of his theology. Andrew Dunstan demonstrates that, through an encounter with fatalistic forms of Reformed theology, Brunner’s charges that his dogmatics were irrelevant and medieval thought, Barth gradually developed an analogy of divine, ecclesial and worldly beauty with all the theological, christocentric and actualistic hallmarks of his previous forms of analogy. This not only yields valuable new insight into Barth’s view of analogy but also provides a much-needed foundation for a distinctively Protestant and post-Barthian approach to theological aesthetics.

chapter |10 pages

Introduction

part I|120 pages

Analogia gloriae

chapter 1|66 pages

Barth's concept of analogy (1919–1968)

chapter 3|19 pages

Barth's analogia gloriae (1940)

part II|76 pages

Analogia pulchritudinis

chapter 4|50 pages

Antecedents

Barth's rudimentary analogy of theological, ecclesial and worldly beauty (1919–1940)

chapter 5|17 pages

Climax

Barth's comprehensive analogy of theological, ecclesial and worldly beauty in Church Dogmatics §31.3 (1940)

chapter 6|8 pages

Final confirmation

Barth's continuing analogy of theological, ecclesial and worldly beauty (1940–1968)

part III|22 pages

Significance

chapter |2 pages

Conclusion