ABSTRACT

Exercising Human Rights investigates why human rights are not universally empowering and why this damages people attempting to exercise rights. It takes a new approach in looking at humans as the subject of human rights rather than the object and exposes the gendered and ethnocentric aspects of violence and human subjectivity in the context of human rights.

Using an innovative visual methodology, Redhead shines a new critical light on human rights campaigns in practice. She examines two cases in-depth. First, she shows how Amnesty International depicts women negatively in their 2004 ‘Stop Violence against Women Campaign’, revealing the political implications of how images deny women their agency because violence is gendered. She also analyses the Oka conflict between indigenous people and the Canadian state. She explains how the Canadian state defined the Mohawk people in such a way as to deny their human subjectivity. By looking at how the Mohawk used visual media to communicate their plight beyond state boundaries, she delves into the disjuncture between state sovereignty and human rights.

This book is useful for anyone with an interest in human rights campaigns and in the study of political images.

part I|65 pages

Gender, Agency and Practice

chapter 1|9 pages

Overview

chapter 2|25 pages

The Fallacy of Gender-Neutrality

chapter 3|29 pages

Agency and Practice

part II|103 pages

Exercising Human Rights

chapter 4|9 pages

Visual Methodology

chapter 5|37 pages

Visualizing Women's Agency

Amnesty International's 2004 Campaign Stop Violence against Women

chapter 6|50 pages

Not in Our Backyard

Visual Agency in the Oka Crisis

chapter 7|5 pages

Reflections