ABSTRACT
The above, for example, applies to channel no. 1, for which Eqs. (7.3) are used. Equations (7.4) are used for the second channel. The m.p. condition of Constraint 1 therefore applies to q22(l + Lj), most of which is not new because m.p. (1 + LI) and det Pare already required. As for Constraint 2, "a.s. sensitivity" can be achieved by L, BW « that of L2 [denoted by BW(Z,) « BW(L2)], and then Eq. (7.4b) implies Constraint 2 applies top22 of P. That is:
For the condition assumed with Eqs. (7. 16) and (7. 17), with no sign changes in the k,j, the results are the same. It may also be so in the general case but this would require consideration of simultaneous sign changes among the kv, which is not done here.
