ABSTRACT

Analysis of the international politics of the Middle East has long been polarized

between International Relations (IR) specialists, typically neo-realists, who

insist that universal rules apply to all regions1 and area specialists who defend

the cultural uniqueness, and consequent political exceptionalism of the Middle

East. More recent theoretical advances have sought, with only partial success, to

bridge this gap. Thus, constructivists supply a universal theory that takes

account of area-specific identity, yet seem to understate the weight of the

material factors stressed by realism; Buzan and Waever, advocates of a ‘thicker’

form of realism, acknowledge the importance of regional variations in material

structure without, however, paying much attention to identity per se. 2

The debate over the Middle East can be located within the larger one in IR

between those who advocate the primacy of material structures and those that

champion ideational factors – an argument already introduced by Gerd

Nonneman in chapter I.3 For what has been called the neo-utilitarians,4 the

dominating world system-level is constituted of material structures, specifically

the core-periphery hierarchy for Marxist structuralists and the global power

balance for neo-realism; these, outside of the control of most small powers,

largely constrain their behavior. This is because utilitarians assume states seek

material interests (wealth and power) and their strategies toward this end are

shaped by their position in systemic structures. For the mostly-weak Arab states,

this is normally one allowing limited autonomy from the core powers and

entailing threats from more powerful non-Arab neighbors and likely, therefore,

to induce ‘bandwagoning’ (appeasing more powerful states) that adapts to

material constraints (and opportunities). Identities and norms, for neo-

utilitarians, are merely used by state elites, either as instruments of power

(e.g. using foreign threats to stir up supportive nationalism) or to legitimize their

material interests.