ABSTRACT
Imperialism is typically described as a system of alien domination locked in perpetual conflict with its opposite-nationalism-presented, generally, as a set of principles representing the authentic collective impulse for independence. The notion that imperialism provokes nationalism exercises such a powerful influence in international relations theory that few scholars even look for creative linkages between the two forces, let alone posit the possibility of interdependence. According to conventional wisdom, imperialism boomerangs because governing a country rightfully belongs to those connected to it by language, culture and residence. Imperialists cross oceans and trek through distant continents hungry for land, treasure and trade, certain of the superiority of their way of life but presumably to no permanent avail. Opposing invasions of their homes and territories, people organize into nationalist movements to fight against imperialism in order to control their own resources, create their own structures of authority, and preserve their own cultures. So the difficulties inherent in imperialism can never really be resolved; they are either buried in forced compliance or ignited into sparks of collective insurrection and revolution.
