ABSTRACT
In addition to clarifying the responsibilities of researchers, a written agreement should articulate the responsibilities of local communities. Because communities do not usually recruit researchers into their area, and there will be tremendous variation by case, it is difficult to generalize on community responsibilities. However, agreements might try to ensure that all information provided by the researcher is communicated effectively within the community and that community interests are well represented. Equitable distribution of benefits throughout the community might also be included as a community responsibility. Because consultations will include, and PIC will be acquired from, individuals selected to represent community interests, these forms of communication and benefit distribution will be likely but not guaranteed in all cases. Logistical matters should also be clarified, including, for example, the provision of housing, structures to hold collections and assistants, guides and informants, for a set number of days and at an agreed fee. Communities might also agree to process researchers’ requests for PIC in an agreed amount of time.
