ABSTRACT

The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession offers a unique interpretation of how literary and public discourses influenced three U.S. Supreme Court Rulings written by Chief Justice John Marshall with respect to Native Americans. These cases, Johnson v. M’Intosh (1823), Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832), collectively known as the Marshall Trilogy, have formed the legal basis for the dispossession of indigenous populations throughout the Commonwealth. The Trilogy cases are usually approached as ‘pure’ legal judgments. This book maintains, however, that it was the literary and public discourses from the early sixteenth through to the early nineteenth centuries that established a discursive tradition which, in part, transformed the American Indians from owners to ‘mere occupants’ of their land. Exploring the literary genesis of Marshall’s judgments, George Pappas draws on the work of Michel Foucault, Edward Said and Homi Bhabha, to analyse how these formative U.S. Supreme Court rulings blurred the distinction between literature and law.

chapter |4 pages

Introduction

part 1|62 pages

Theoretical foundations and the Marshall Trilogy cases

chapter 1|18 pages

Theoretical framework

chapter 2|30 pages

The Marshall Trilogy cases

An overview

chapter 3|13 pages

Colonial knowledge

A unity of discourses

part 2|92 pages

Refining the Native American

chapter 4|28 pages

Theory of discourse in a colonial context

Edward Said and the American eighteenth-century literary archive

chapter 6|19 pages

Fenimore Cooper's The Last of the Mohicans

part 3|63 pages

Resistance to colonial discourse

chapter 8|18 pages

Law and literature

chapter 9|31 pages

Cherokee resistance

Mimicry as deception

chapter 10|13 pages

Conclusion