ABSTRACT
The fundamental problem to be focused on, again, is entropy. If one claims that the Earth is a closed system (which it is not, globally speaking) entropy eventually burns up the possibility, potential, or viability for, or of, life. If one selects a model in which the universe is in direct interface with the Earth, randomness and external entropic factors can create such chaos that no life either ever appeared or could not be uniformly sustained. The trick with evolution theory is to assume a scale on which the exchange rate enables one to bank energy so that the possible emergence of life is not a counterfeit medium of exchange. I wish to argue that, as with the foregoing argument concerning inorganic evolution, we have no empirical or logical grounds for certainty that biological evolution theory can, nor originally did, surmount the problems of entropy and chaos. These problems are internal to the genome (i.e. the genetic identity of a species and genus) and macro biological systems, as well as the external functions of entropy in the global and larger context of its spacetime physical environments.
