ABSTRACT
A theory of syncretism as an analytical tool, allowing insights into the conditions leading to certain 'syncretistic' processes, should also throw some light on contemporary developments. 'Systematization' designates the processes, serving to solve the problems arising from the encounter of different systems or from enduring competition. 'Rationalization' is used to designate those processes solving problems that do not arise from confrontation with other systems, but which are rather the result of disturbances within a system. The processes of rationalization and systematization in religious history can be understood as a response to these two basic forms of testing. Beginning with the system concept permits the elimination of metaphorical descriptions from syncretism research. Syncretism is taking place on a level beyond the preceding systems and can be designated a 'Meta-Syncretism'. In contrast to the synthesis as a creative process, this is a 'pseudo-synthesis'. The result of this process can be termed a "syncretistic religion" or a "syncretistic system".
