ABSTRACT
The descriptions of both the Tibetan canonical collections of translated literature,–viz., the catalogues of the bKa’-’gyur (bKa’-’gyur-ro-cog-gi-dkar-chag) and bsTan-’gyur (bsTan-’gyur-ro-cog-gi-dkar-chag)–should also, to a certain extent, be regarded as historical works of Tibet.
