ABSTRACT
In constructing their own definitions of social problems, the value-conflict theorists sought to distinguish between an objective condition and the definition of conditions as a problem. This chapter examines in some detail the failures and compromises of the value-conflict writings. Every social problem consists of an objective condition and a subjective definition. The objective condition is a verifiable situation which can be checked as to existence and magnitude by impartial and trained observers. The subjective definition is the awareness of certain individuals that the condition is a threat to certain cherished values. The chapter also examines the typologies of social problems proposed by the value-conflict theorists. The characteristic pessimism of value-conflict theorists regarding solutions to social problems extended to criticism and disdain for those attempting to solve social problems by tinkering with social institutions.
