ABSTRACT

A prose dialogue between two citizens discussing political events in the form of a parody of Roger L’Estrange’s Citt and Bumpkin, published the previous month. It presents itself as an ironic dramatic dialogue, and is arguably readable as an example of coffee-house conversation, albeit couched in a satire. In this estimation, such coffee-house discussions are colloquial yet informed; based on covert intelligence but speculative and inquiring; conspiratorial yet revelatory; knowledgeable yet vulgar.