ABSTRACT
It is about showing that an exact discipline of the human economy is nothing absurd; that the demurs, which gave reason to these large circles, also turn away from it, but by taking a closer look is to be taken less seriously than one would like to believe at first glance. No two economic subjects have the same ownership of goods; no two would behave in the same manner, even if this case were to occur. Within their economic trade, all their relationships in life, personal and social, their entire history and that of their ancestors, no less the fiats of the surrounding nature, mirror themselves. The economic subjects can get their goods in very different ways, exchange them, or produce them themselves. In the diction of the "psychological" theory, this means that each good is being acquired in such a quantity that the lastly-acquired sub-quantities satisfy all identically-intensive necessity movements..
