ABSTRACT
This chapter provides methodological guidance for researchers interested in investigating the pleasures and displeasures that participants feel in response to exercise (termed ‘affective responses’). A conclusion often found in textbooks is that exercise makes people ‘feel better’ but this statement seems to contrast with the low rates of regular participation in exercise and physical activity. This chapter explains how early methodological decisions that originally seemed reasonable inadvertently biased research results in favour of the ‘feel-better’ effect. The sections address implications deriving from several aspects of the research process including the sampling of participants, the choice of constructs (affect, mood, emotion), the timing of the assessment protocols, the methods of standardizing exercise intensity across participants and the approach used to examine change over time. In each case, the authors explain how the original methods may have led to bias and propose preferable alternatives.
