ABSTRACT
In the past the most violent verbal attacks had produced no consequences. But when behind this screen of ideological verbiage the two countries began to muse upon their fundamental historical aspirations the situation was completely changed. The historical parallel is worth remarking. On 1811 the Austrian Minister in St. Petersburg wrote a report on the situation after the Battle of Tilsit. He insisted that the Tsar Alexander was more distrustful than ever regarding the future intentions of Napoleon, and that he felt that an attempt was being made to hoodwink him until the moment of a sudden explosion. During these crucial months Stalin accelerated the rhythm of his activities, but this was from considerations of a general order. Even while he was preparing the defence of Britain, while he was encouraging and inspiring its spirit of resistance by speeches of a truly classical greatness and audacity, Churchill achieved a masterpiece of diplomacy, which adds another leaf to his laurel wreath.
