ABSTRACT
The American Committee to Keep Biafra Alive (ACKBA) was the largest and most influential organization in the United States that formed in response to the Nigerian civil war. While historians have pointed to the committee as an important source of activism that pushed the American government toward supporting more vigorous humanitarian relief, this is the first chapter to explore the development of the group from its inception and to look specifically at its claims of genocide. Not everyone at the time agreed that the Nigerian government was committing genocide against the people living in the secessionist state of Biafra, and that debate continues until today. The ACKBA, appealing to genocide prevention and human rights, argued that the debate about the semantics of genocide got in the way of actually helping those that were suffering from famine as a result of the war. In the process, the committee offered a redefinition of genocide that wedded conceptions of Biafran identity to the Biafran state, which made the maintenance of one Nigeria, in the eyes of committee members, an act of genocide. In the end, this redefinition of genocide failed to bring more people in the United States toward supporting Biafran secession and might have, in the end, led to more confusion about genocide during the conflict. An analysis of the committee’s activism highlights the often-tenuous relationship between self-determination and genocide in the developing world and illustrates the growing limits of American political intervention in the global south.
