ABSTRACT
Euthanasia may also be a vehicle for addressing much wider and deeper realities that operate at conscious, unconscious, and symbolic levels. Some people attribute the augmented perceived need for euthanasia as being yet one more effect of modern medical technology. Calls for the legalization of euthanasia have frequently been phrased in terms of respect for individual rights. Recognition of a quality of life principle is often linked to euthanasia, in particular, by the two opposing groups who argue for a broad definition of euthanasia—that is, some groups in the pro-life movement who argue that any intervention that would shorten life should be prohibited, and persons who are pro-choice on euthanasia. Euthanasia is advocated as being suffering reducing by those in favor of its being allowed and, therefore, persons who are anti-euthanasia can be perceived as being pro-suffering. The criminal law of all countries prohibits culpable homicide—murder and manslaughter. Euthanasia is prohibited pursuant to such laws.
