ABSTRACT

For Sir Geoffrey Elton, Thomas Cromwell was ‘one of the most remarkable

English statesmen of the sixteenth century and one of the most remarkable in

the country’s history’,2 who ‘instigated and in part accomplished a major and

enduring transformation in virtually every aspect of the nation’s public life’.3

He was ‘a statesman with real and even elevated purposes, a man of genuine

understanding and affability, a tower of strength to those who sought his help’,4

Above all, he was the architect of the Tudor Revolution in Government, ‘a

revolution in the kingdom from which the nation emerged transformed and

altered in every aspect of its life.5 In his last book, Elton continued to assert

essentially the same views of Cromwell’s work: ‘he instilled so novel a force

and concentrated purpose into government that something like a major

transformation took place in the relations between rulers and ruled’.6 In

contrast, Henry VIII, according to Elton, had ‘an unoriginal and unproductive

mind’, one ‘unable to penetrate independently to the heart of a problem’.7 It

was Cromwell who saw to the administration of the kingdom: ‘the details

of government, the day-to-day work of the executive, the control and reform

of the administrative machine, these were in his hands’.8 ‘In Cromwell’s years

of power the king rarely interfered in administrative matters and .. . Cromwell,

not Henry, was really the government’.9 By and large Elton’s interpretation

has commanded the field, owing not least to his tireless articulation of it

over forty years. R.B. Wernham, who wrote a pungent review of The Tudor

Revolution in Government, was unusual in questioning Elton’s claims about

the relationship of Henry VIII and Cromwell; but unlike Elton, he did not

reiterate his views.10 Later critics of The Tudor Revolution in Government

concentrated, in what became a famous debate, on the issues of administration

and government that Elton had raised, rather than on the specific question

of king and minister. Meanwhile Elton received powerful support from A.G.

Dickens: