ABSTRACT
Typically mid-course corrections involve two main steps: gathering data and making adjustments. With classwork underway, an instructor may wonder what parts of the course are going well and what refinements might be appropriate. Mid-course corrections allow a perceptive instructor to build on those successful course elements and alter those that might be improved. When an instructor asks for feedback, students may report what they really think. Students may not be able to identify specific difficulties, but they can report their perceptions. Some faculty might consider such feedback a potential risk. If an instructor views education as a hierarchical institution, negative student comments or suggestions may be interpreted as disrespectful or challenge to a faculty member's position as the class head. In this model, a faculty member is supposed to have all of the answers, so feedback might be considered a threat.
