ABSTRACT

I. Introduction.......................................................................................... 231

II. Bias ...................................................................................................... 232

III. Modifications Using “Blinded” Data .................................................. 234

A. Blinding......................................................................................... 233

B. Partial Unblinding......................................................................... 234

C. The Null Neutral Principle ........................................................... 235

D. Adaptive Statistical Analysis Planning ........................................ 237

E. Scope and Limitations .................................................................. 237

IV. Modifications Using Unblinded Data.................................................. 237

A. Bias and Naive Analysis............................................................... 237

B. The Philosophy of Adaptive Designs........................................... 238

C. Two-Stage Adaptive Designs ....................................................... 238

1. Adaptation ............................................................................... 239

2. Hypothesis Testing.................................................................. 240

3. Point Estimation and Confidence Intervals ............................ 241

D. Adaptive Group Sequential Designs ............................................ 242

V. Discussion ............................................................................................ 242

References........................................................................................................ 243

Some bias is inevitable in controlled clinical trials. The issue relevant to trial

modifications based on external or internal data is whether additional bias

would be introduced. It is naive to equate blindness with validity, i.e., to accept

the premise that the trial organizers are free to make trial modifications without

introducing bias if only blinded data are used, while bias is unavoidable but

immeasurable when modifications are based on unblinded data. We point out that

neither part of this proposition is true. A fruitful approach presented here is to

examine how trial modifications would introduce additional bias from various

sources. While careful planning and execution are necessary, it is also essential to

select appropriate adaptive design and inferential procedures in order to avoid

additional bias.