ABSTRACT
Traditionalaccountsofthedifferencebetweenthepassatoprossimo ("nearpast")(PP)andpassatoremota("remotepast")(PR)under-
scorethepointthatinmodernstandardItalianthetwotensescontrast onlyinwrittenliterarydiscourse,sincePRhasalmostdisappeared
fromconversationaluse. Inthe"familiar"speechofmostnorthernItalianregions,thePRis
saidtohavebeenreplacedbythePP(Rohlfs1986;Lepschyand Lepschy1981;Harris1982),whileincentralandsouthernItalythe PRisstillused.Therearecontrastingopinionsontheextentofthe useofthePRincentralItaly.Forinstance,Rohlfssaysthat"in centralItalythepassatoremotobeginstoloseground:inFlorenceitis notmuchinuse"(1966:45-6);whileLepschyandLepschystatethat boththePRandthePParefoundinTuscanyandcentralItalyandthat theyhavedifferentmeaningswhicharemirroredinliterary/written language.