ABSTRACT

Misunderstanding News Audiences interrogates the prevailing myths around the impact of the Internet and social media on news consumption and democracy. The book draws on a broad range of comparative research into audience engagement with news, across different geographic regions, to provide insight into the experience of news audiences in the twenty-first century.

From its inception, it was imagined that the Internet would benignly transform the nature of news media and its consumers. There were predictions that it would, for example, break up news oligarchies, improve plurality and diversity through news personalisation, create genuine social solidarity online, and increase political awareness and participation among citizens. However, this book finds that, while mainstream news media is still the major source of news, the new media environment appears to lead to greater polarisation between news junkies and news avoiders, and to greater political polarisation. The authors also argue that the dominant role of the USA in the field of news audience research has created myths about a global news audience, which obscures the importance of national context as a major explanation for news exposure differences.

Misunderstanding News Audiences presents an important analysis of findings from recent audience studies and, in doing so, encourages readers to re-evaluate popular beliefs about the influence of the Internet on news consumption and democracy in the West.

 

chapter 1|11 pages

Introduction

News audiences, and the myths of the social media era

chapter 2|22 pages

Personalisation is Democratisation

Myth: news personalisation will improve plurality, diversity and ultimately democracy

chapter 3|22 pages

We are all journalists now

Myth: the role of the journalist is merging with the role of the audience 1

chapter 4|24 pages

The wisdom of crowds? How algorithms rule online

Myth: the many are smarter than the few

chapter 5|19 pages

Globalisation

Myth: the Internet has produced the “global village” envisioned by McLuhan

chapter 6|22 pages

Communities online are replacing communities offline

Myth: real social solidarity online has displaced the imagined solidarity of the mass news media

chapter 7|22 pages

The end of trust in mainstream media

Myth: the Internet and social media have replaced edited news

chapter 8|19 pages

The net generation will revolutionise the way we relate to news

Myth: there is a digital generation with an innate understanding of digital communication

chapter 9|9 pages

Conclusion