ABSTRACT
The second phase of the presidential selection process, the national nominating conventions, has lost much of its importance since changes in the nominating process have essentially shifted the determination of the nominees from the convention floors to state delegate selection processes. In recent decades, the voting at a convention has served simply to confirm a choice that was, in effect, made well before the delegates assembled. This change has led some observers to conclude that conventions are no longer necessary. These analysts argue that conventions are little more than highly orchestrated media events, designed to place the best light on the party's standard-bearer. Others note that the convention still plays a vital role in the selection process, especially given its role in the drafting of party platforms, in developing party rules, in choosing a vice presidential candidate, in unifying the party faithful behind the nominees, and in launching the general election campaign.
