ABSTRACT

Bringing together a comparative analysis of the accessibility by public transport of 23 cities spanning four continents, this book provides a "hands-on" introduction to the evolution, rationale and effectiveness of a new generation of accessibility planning tools that have emerged since the mid-2000s. The Spatial Network Analysis for Multimodal Urban Transport Systems (SNAMUTS) tool is used as a practical example to demonstrate how city planners can find answers as they seek to improve public transport accessibility. Uniquely among the new generation of accessibility tools, SNAMUTS has been designed for multi-city comparisons. A range of indicators are employed in each city including: the effectiveness of the public transport network; the relationship between the transport network and land use activity; who gets access within the city; and how resilient the city will be. The cities selected enable a comparison between cities by old world–new world; public transport modes; governance approach; urban development constraints. The book is arranged along six themes that address the different planning challenges cities confront. Richly illustrated with maps and diagrams, this volume acts as a comprehensive sourcebook of accessibility indicators and a snapshot of current policy making around the world in the realm of strategic planning for land use transport integration and the growth of public transport. It provides a deeper understanding of the complexity, opportunities and challenges of twenty-first-century accessibility planning.

chapter 1|5 pages

Introduction

What Is Accessibility Planning and Why Does It Matter?

chapter 2|16 pages

Spatial Network Analysis for Multimodal Urban Transport Systems (SNAMUTS)

Understanding the Indicators

chapter 4|43 pages

Stagnation and Aspiration in North American Cities

Overcoming the Totalitarianism of Automobility

chapter 5|46 pages

More with Less?

Accessibility and Public Transport Efficiency in European Cities

chapter 9|6 pages

Conclusion

Accessibility and Best-Practice Land Use–Transport Integration