ABSTRACT

The history of Sensate Focus indicates the power of the words that are chosen for Sensate Focus suggestions, and these words may hinder or facilitate therapeutic progress. Masters and Johnson seem to have accurately conveyed the idea that sexual responsivity could not be produced on demand. The confusion about the main idea underlying Sensate Focus, that sex is a natural function, has to do not so much with the concept itself but more with a lack of appreciation for its profound significance. The confusions over the concept of sex as a natural function, and the practical Sensate Focus suggestions that come out of this concept, are perfect examples of the power of language to shape emotions, attitudes, and even behavior. Throughout the 1983 postgraduate training at the Institute, the aims of Sensate Focus were clearly delineated as "the toucher is to touch for themselves – trace with intention of taking in sensations.